There is a direct correlation between the coating chosen for a naval ship’s hull, rudders and running gear, decks, tanks and other surfaces, and that ship’s readiness for action. It is vital to choose the right coatings for protection and performance of the ships that are being counted on for national defense.

ENEMIES OF THE FLEET

Hull Roughness

A rough hull is a serious strategic and tactical handicap in any ship operations, impairing a ship’s speed and maneuverability, increasing fuel consumption, and reducing the ship’s range. There are two usual causes for a rough ship hull: paint, and biofouling.

Paint

Inferior paints degrade over time so that even if smooth when first applied, they become rougher in service. Antifouling paints are designed to wear away as they leach their biocidal content in an effort to deter marine fouling from settling on the hull. The coating is self-sacrificing. These coatings are usually repaired in drydock and a fresh top-coat of antifouling applied. The results can be a very rough hull.

Hull state before and after repair
Typical state of a hull in drydock after sailing three or five years with conventional antifouling paint (left). Ship after being repaired in drydock, ready to sail with a very rough hull (right).

The following chart shows the increase in hull roughness as the ship ages. It is from the book Advances in Marine Antifouling Coatings and Technology.

Hull Roughness vs Age Chart
7.9 Increased average hull roughness with ship age and effect on powering.

Biofouling

As soon as a ship or other object is placed in the water, especially salt water, it begins to attract marine fouling, first developing a slime layer, followed by algae and then barnacles and other calcareous fouling which continues to increase.

This biofouling progressively increases the hull’s friction in the water, resulting in reduced speed for the same engine power/revs, increased fuel consumption, decreased range and a more sluggish ship which is harder to maneuver. The so-called “fuel penalty” can be very high.

The following chart of fuel penalties relative to biofouling is based on definitive experiments and testing done by Michael P. Schultz of the Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering of the United States Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland in 2007.

Fuel Penalty Chart

Problem with existing hull coating systems in general use

Antifouling paints are supposed to prevent biofouling from accumulating during the entire drydocking interval of the ship. In practice they are usually unable to accomplish this. The hull fouls despite the toxic antifouling coatings, and in-water cleaning is needed to try to reduce drag.

However, these types of coatings are not suitable for in-water cleaning. Any attempt to do so seriously depletes and damages the remaining coating, and creates a pulse discharge of toxic substances causing short and long-term damage to the marine environment. The coating surface is made rougher, and biofouling accumulates more rapidly after such cleaning.

Because of the environmental concerns, in-water cleaning of antifouling coatings is regulated and, in many ports and locations, completely forbidden.


Corrosion

Corrosion is an electrochemical reaction which results in the wasting away of steel and other materials. The marine environment promotes corrosion heavily. This is a serious enemy to fleet readiness. There are a number of forms and causes of corrosion in addition to the general corrosion commonly known as rust, which is perhaps the most visible.

Cavitation

A special case of corrosion results from the damaging effects of cavitation, a phenomenon that accompanies turbulent fluids. It is particularly noticeable on rudders, inside thruster tunnels, on energy saving devices such as Kort nozzles, twisted fins, and on the propeller. Cavitation quickly destroys conventional antifouling hull coatings and exposes the steel to rapid erosion and corrosion.

Abrasion and wear

Ice, narrow locks, tugs, sand and gravel, floating debris and many other causes of abrasion and wear on a ship’s hull can remove the paint and expose the underlying steel to corrosion. In the case of decks, heavy vehicle traffic can remove any protective coating and again expose the substrate to corrosion.

Chemicals

Tanks and pipes are particularly susceptible to the corrosive effects of chemicals such as the acidic effluent from scrubbers or the corrosive effect of sewage and even salt water. This can pose a threat to the ship’s integrity.


DEFEATING THESE ENEMIES

There is a relatively simple solution to all of these corrosion and performance related problems. While many approaches have been tried, the one that has proved successful in all cases where it has been applied is simply the use of the correct coating – one which is tough and durable enough to prevent all forms of corrosion listed above, and which is not harmful to the marine environment. Such a coating (for example, the Ecospeed family of coatings from Subsea Industries) can be cleaned in or out of the water whenever needed without damaging the coating itself or the marine environment. Not only is protection provided, hull performance is also greatly improved.

This same coating, which is a glass-platelet reinforced vinyl ester, is also highly resistant to most chemicals, including the acids in scrubber effluents and the contents of sewage and other tanks as well as salt water. It is also highly abrasion resistant and has been classified as ice-abrasion resistant Polar Code (PC) 1 - 7. And it has even been found suitable by class for use in lieu of cathodic protection (sacrificial anodes or ICCP). Thousands of applications attest to its effectiveness in all these regards.

A major cruise line found that it was able to save 10% of its fuel consumption with Ecospeed compared to the antifouling paint system it had been using before.

Cruise ship hull comparison
Hull of cruise ship 5 years after being coated with conventional antifouling paint (left) and five years after being coated with Ecospeed (right).

New Navy corvettes were having very severe cavitation problems with their rudders. This was solved by the use of Ecoshield.

Navy corvette rudder comparison
Rudder of new navy corvette after a few days of sea trials with conventional antifouling paint (left) and 6 months after being coated with Ecoshield (right).

Container ships which used to suffer severe cavitation damage to their rudders and thruster tunnels, found these problems solved when Ecoshield was applied.

Container ship rudder comparison
Rudder of large container ship after five years with conventional antifouling paint (left) and the same rudder 10 years after Ecoshield was applied, with no repainting over that period (right).
Scrubber tank comparison
Scrubber recycling tank of container ship with conventional paint after five years has almost completely disappeared (left). Same tank two years after being coated with Ecoshield (right).

Container ship scrubber recycle tanks that previously would be almost completely eaten away from one drydocking to the next, remained in excellent condition when Ecospeed was applied.

Several Antarctic research and supply icebreakers found that where previously they had to repaint their ships every year, Ecospeed remained intact year after year (16 years and counting in one case) without the need for recoating in drydock.

Six mine hunters were coated with Ecospeed and did not need repainting for the remainder of their service life.

A ro-pax ferry was in danger of being declassified due to the heavy corrosion and pitting on the main vehicle deck. Ecospeed was applied and four years later the ferry was still in business with a well-protected deck.

Icebreaker hull comparison
Hull of icebreaking Antarctic research/supply ship after a year in the ice with conventional ice-class paint (left) and sixteen (16!) years after being coated with Ecospeed (right) with no repainting, only some touch-ups.

The Ecospeed family of coatings has been shown over and over again to provide complete protection against corrosion while at the same time lending itself to excellent fuel efficiency, abrasion and chemical resistance, and longevity.


MAJOR CONTRIBUTION TO FLEET READINESS

Use of the correct coating for ships’ hulls, rudders, running gear, tanks, solves the problems of corrosion and hull performance and can contribute greatly to fleet readiness and tactical capability.